
Rank your top 3 Kirkland Signature whiskeys
Tap your favourite first, then your second and third. Tap again to remove.
Your top 3
✓ Thank you — your ranking has been recorded!
Something went wrong. Please try again.
Named after one of its early proponents and patent-holders, Irishman Aeneas Coffey, the Coffey Still was the first commercialized continuous still. Unlike pot stills, Coffey stills can be run continuously, with pre-heated mash introduced while the fractionating column continues to operate. This makes them faster and more efficient in terms of energy and labor than pot stills, which run on a batch system and must be charged between batches.
In general, pot stills produce a lower-proof distillate that retains more of the aromatic oils and large flavor molecules (both good and bad!) produced during fermentation. Coffey stills produce a purer, stronger distillate with a lighter body and more delicate flavor profile. That makes for better blending stock as well as more consistent, predictable quality in the new-make distillate.
So which is better, pot stills or continuous stills? The answer is that uniquely unsatisfying phrase: it depends.
Pot stills hold a lot of cachet, especially in certain parts of the world. Scotch single malt and cognac, for instance, must be made on a pot still by definition. Many craft distillers are also squarely in the pot still camp, although perhaps because they tend to be a good bit cheaper to purchase and operate.















